Prediction of Brandon Nakashima [31st] vs James Kent Trotter [175th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W W L L
Form
W L L W W L L W L LH2H: Nakashima 2 - 0 Trotter
They have played 4 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 4 and Trotter winning 0. The last match between Nakashima and Trotter was at the Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach, 11-02-2025, First, Hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | 2 |
| James Kent Trotter | 0 |
| Nakashima | Stats | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (12-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (9-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 31 | Ranking | 175 |
| 31 | Highest Rank | 173 |
| 23 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 3 |
| 61% (238-150) | Career Total W/L | 60% (99-67) |
| $3,035,300 | Career Prize Money | $79,295 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-1 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
James Kent Trotter
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 15 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:27:14 | Average Match Time | 1:27:14 |
| 63% (68/108) | 1st Serve % | 59% (80/135) |
| 84% (57/68) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (52/80) |
| 73% (29/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (30/55) |
| 29% (4/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (53/135) | Return Points Win % | 20% (22/108) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brandon Nakashima vs James Kent Trotter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nakashima 2 - 0 Trotter
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 48.01% of points on their second serve, while Trotter has won 50.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 39.34% of their opponent's second serve points, while Trotter has won 41.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.51% and 19.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 60.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Trotter has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 59.76% of matches played (W/L 49/ 33), with Trotter winning 64.62% (W/L 42/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 65/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 31/ 29). Trotter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 37/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17), where as Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.64% of matches (W/L 39/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nakashima winning 2 times and Trotter being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 4 and Trotter winning 0. The last match between Nakashima and Trotter was at the Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach, 11-02-2025, First, Hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Trotter have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nakashima winning 0 times and Trotter 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 1, and Trotter 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 91.02 while Trotter has played against players with an average rank of 312.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Trotter has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 36.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Trotter has converted 29.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Brandon Nakashima
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
33 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
David Goffin
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
14
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
James Kent Trotter
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
6
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
James McCabe
59%
(
78 of
133)
1st Serve %
57%
(
74 of
129)
7
Aces
15
10
Double Faults
5
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
53 of
74)
53%
(
29 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
32%
(
42 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
45 of
129)
136
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(9) 7-6(1) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
128)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Ryan Seggerman
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
105)
6
Aces
23
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Nakashima vs Trotter?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Nakashima Vs Trotter is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (238/150) | Win/Loss | 60% (99/67) |
| 59% (568/387) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (215/169) |
| 53% (5009/4391) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2016/1818) |
| 0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.73 |
| 2602 | Aces Total | 1371 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 666 | Total Double Faults | 484 |
| 1:44:39 | Average Match Time | 1:38:29 |
| 263.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.62 |
| 64% (17892/28174) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6491/10957) |
| 75% (13339/17892) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (4986/6491) |
| 54% (5567/10282) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2298/4466) |
| 38% (937/2475) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (341/878) |
| 37% (10870/29325) | Return Points Win % | 36% (3999/11020) |
| 61% (212/345) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (97/164) |
| 57% (23/40) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (118/215) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (44/81) |
| 50% (61/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (35/54) |
| 86% (240/206) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (85/76) |
| 14% (240/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (85/9) |
| 20% (147/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (81/23) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Brandon Nakashima
View full predicted draw for Nakashima in Barcelona
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
